|
(Written for
the newsletter of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Catskills, November
2001)
9/11
proves to reinforce people's beliefs, or lack of them
Recently I have been going more often to a strange
but wonderful website: www.beliefnet.com.
Beliefnet is one of those things that is only possible on the Web. It is a
smorgasbord of religion, a buffet. Various famous and unknown people from all
parts of the religious spectrum write on it. Heaven knows how they get Christian
fundamentalists, Christian modernists, atheists, Jews, Muslims, Hindus,
Buddhists, Wiccans all writing on the same site. You can read Thich Nhat Hanh,
Michael Lerner, Starhawk, Bishop Spong, Gregg Easterbrook, Debra Dickerson (look under Columnists).
In the week after 9/11 on Beliefnet I read about:
§
The Fundamentalist: A report about Bethel Assembly of God
deacon Stanley Praimnath of Elmont, Long Island. Stanley was standing at his
desk on the 81st floor of WTC 2 when he saw the second plane coming apparently
directly for his window. He dived under the desk. It hit somewhere above him,
but a flaming wing of the plane landed in the doorway of his department. He was
buried in debris, and there was no exit. He prayed, found extraordinary physical
strength, broke through a wall with the help of a man with a flashlight, and
made it out of the building. "For some divine reason, I know, beyond a
shadow of a doubt, that the good Lord's mighty hand turned the plane a fraction
from where I was standing," said Stanley. "Because when it
crash-landed, it was just 20 feet from me. I don't care who would rationalize --
what people would say now or years from now, but I know it was the handiwork of
the Lord that turned that plane. My Lord Jesus is bigger than the Trade Center
and His finger can push a plane aside!" I was flabbergasted. Did Stanley
think there were no other deserving people among the thousands slain? I feel
sick even quoting Stanley, partly because his mindset seems so close to that of
the people who created this horror; partly because it appears to skip so
mindlessly over the real problems of believing in a miracle-working God during a
century in which the Holocaust happened, let alone other horrors.
§
A Personal God is Impossible: But also that week on
Beliefnet, I read John Shelby Spong, the controversial liberal Episcopalian
bishop. His essay was titled, The Theistic God is Dead--A Casualty of
Terrorism. He wrote: “This tragedy brought a wide variety of religious
leaders to public attention, each seeking to provide comfort. Their pious
rhetoric, however, was strangely stilted, unconvincing, and sentimental… A
desperate need seemed to exist among these religious leaders to demonstrate that
God was still in charge. One suspects that this claim covers a deep suspicion,
seldom spoken by human lips, that no such God exists and that we are alone in
this vast, chaotic and frequently painful world. When tragedies occur and no
divine protection is forthcoming, human hysteria forces us to struggle to restore
our protective, parent God to believability.” But Spong is a believer. By an
unbelievable ‘theistic’ God, he means one whose finger can turn planes
aside. He writes: “God is not an external, supernatural being, ruling over
human history. God is rather the power of love, which flows through each of us,
calling us to life, inviting us to step beyond whatever binds our humanity, even
if it is the old images of God… The worship of this God, who is life, love and
being, will never be a magic potion, which exists to keep us safe. It will,
however, call us to move toward universalism, to move beyond the need to find
acts of revenge that only expand the cycle of violence. It will build in us the
commitment to live our lives in such a way as to create a new world in which
everyone has a better chance to experience God by living fully, loving
wastefully, and being all that they are capable of being in the infinite variety
of the human family.”
§
The Atheist: Also that week on Beliefnet there was
atheist Richard Dawkins, Professor of the Public Understanding of Science,
University of Oxford, and author of influential books like The Selfish Gene,
and The Blind Watchmaker. He said it’s no wonder that if people leave
dangerous religions lying around, promising paradise, someone may use them.
Last week (middle of November '01)
Beliefnet was presenting evidence of a
reformation starting in Islam, with links to websites by moderate Islamic
scholars who are speaking out. It’s worth a visit.
|
|